> Just to clarify my position, I'm not opposing the indentation "Only", I think > the language should have a C-style version of it, with keywords and all.
What do you think should change in Nim to be more appealing to C (or C++, Go, Rust, ...) developers, apart from braces and keywords? If Nim is too different, it's, well, too different (as it seems to be your concern right now). On the other hand, if (a variant of) Nim is too similar to these other languages, there's not enough reason too switch (or pick up additionally) either. So which features would you change in which ways? How to you think potentially interested developers would react to the things that are still different? How would this reaction be different for developers being mainly familiar with C, C++, Go or Rust?
