Hello all, I have been annoyed that everything is encapsulated under a single
parent object in my project, like this:
type
Global = object
st1: St1
st2: St2
...
var g: Global
foo(g)
bar(g)
Run
Nearly every proc operates on this type and most likely it's passed as a `var`
parameter. It also means fields are deeply nested, so you will see a lot of
this pattern: `g.st1.foo.bar`.
Would this style be more preferable:
var
st1: Stat1
st2: Stat2
foo(st1, st2)
bar(st2)
Run
This way you can fine-tune what data you pass as mutable/non-mutable
parameters. I would suppose this way it's more, or is it considered
micromanaging? Which one do you prefer when writing code in Nim?
Looking at the most popular project written in Nim, the compiler, I spotted a
lot of procs that follow this pattern in their signature:
proc foo(bar: var Bar; baz: Baz; bas: var Bas)
Run
So I suppose, that's more idiomatic?
