> but I couldn't find a way to replicate all of my usecases with it. Please continue to use the dot operators until a better solution emerges.
See also <https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/341>
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` design? rb3
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` design? saem
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` design? Araq
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` design? rb3
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` desig... shirleyquirk
- Might there be a better `dotOperators` ... JohnAD
- Might there be a better `dotOperato... rb3
- Might there be a better `dotOpe... Araq
