> Nim 2.0 will be last change for this language to finally take off, but it > needs proper coordination and goals, sorry for saying that.. but someone > should be honest even if is not good to read.
Well you're honest but your message is full of pathos and worse, contradictions. So we should focus the development and have a **vision** and "only" work on: Threading, currency, stdlib, IC, ORC and tooling. Oh and compiler bugs, of course. And only once all these aspects are polished version 2.0 should be released. Oh and we should write a book and release it online, for free. Sure, sure.
