So, the not-so-subtle message of SunnyCorleone's post is to compare two books people took special care to acknowledge being different in both intents and execution, declare one better than the other, define Nim (and wider Nim content) priorities and discuss author's command of English. All in the topic for discussing other person's video. Well done.
Speaking strictly in hypotheticals (not hinting on anyone), a useful and insightful book written with deficient language might be more useful than its opposite. Also, NIA was published by Manning and probably had at least a surface-level editorial support (I may be wrong there, but that would only speak poorly of Manning). CPwNPL is self-published and isn't even considered done. _Nim_ in Action: > This is by no means a beginner’s book. _Computer Programming_ with the Nim Programming Language: > A gentle Introduction 🤷 Instead of just pointing that Stefan's harsh reception wasn't appropriate the thread quickly devolved into a back-and-forth "but of course your book...". I don't think this is good for the morale, especially when some core team members are involved.
