>From the "safer" webpage you linked: > All in all Nim is fairly safe if you stick to the Nim layer, but since it has > 1:1 C/C++ interop you can of course expose yourself to all the bugs that can > arise from those languages (either by yourself, or through a wrapper).
At my job I have to learn Rust. I was just now reading about cxxbridge and bindgen, two of the (multiple) tools Rust developers have to create bindings for C/C++. This is a common thing to do in Rust, and it inevitably means that one exposes oneself "to all the bugs that can arise from those languages (either by yourself, or through a wrapper)." On this score, Rust is no safer than Nim. Plus, you have to work with Rust, definitely a negative in my book (so far).
