> the answer to your question you repeatedly ask is that different people have > different tastes in what programming language they would like to write in. > This answer should be news to -- exactly no one.
I think you have misunderstand my question. I'm not trying to convince any thing. My question is: Nim have a nice language interoperability. Why some people still spend time to develop a existing feature in C/Rust ecosystem? I don't see usefulness of doing that. Most Nim lib is in early stage, and miss feature, not actively maintened compare to a Rust or C lib. Why people don't just wrap this full feature, actively maintened, industrially used library. Users can benefit a good quality library, developer of lib can save time. > Your continued pressing of the question I continue ask the same question, because I see most people don't really answer my question: "why don't write just a wrapper". Most answer is about Nim is or not safer and faster than Rust. But it is not my question, it is just one of the assumptions that my question base on. > combined with ignoring all rebuttals I haven't ignored any thing, I just reply the people who answer me, and express my mind about what he said.
