> If you create a file config.nims and write a line like switch("import",
> "sugar"), you can write Nim code without writing import sugar under the
> directory containing that config.nims.
For me, the idea that module imports should be in the module itself is quite
obvious.
> Are you sure making sugar built-in really improve nim?
[Yes.](https://hsto.org/webt/de/76/ib/de76ibuom2m5hxpkrrzn_bpdqgm.png)
Here's what I can add:
* Nim comes with a std, that includes sugar. Adding sugar to `system` not
affect to user disc space.
* Sugar candies + `with` are macros, and will also have no effect on the size
of the executable.
* In do notation you can already use `->` without any imports.
* With my suggestion, promoting the use of in-place style would be much
easier.
