This is good, but why can't we modify `used`? The name is exactly on point and it currently suppresses a warning about unused procs which is pretty close to what we want. Additionally taking it as an indication to the backend that it should generate code for an unused `proc` seems intuitive.
- Force compilation of unused parts of a module deech
- Force compilation of unused parts of a module elcritch
- Force compilation of unused parts of a module Araq
- Force compilation of unused parts of a module xigoi
- Force compilation of unused parts of a module Yardanico
- Force compilation of unused parts of a mod... sls1005
- Force compilation of unused parts of a... elcritch
- Force compilation of unused parts ... cblake
- Force compilation of unused parts ... Araq
- Force compilation of unused parts ... dom96
- Force compilation of unused parts ... deech
- Force compilation of unused parts ... Araq
- Force compilation of unused parts ... mratsim
- Force compilation of unused parts ... Araq
- Force compilation of unused parts ... elcritch
