> The Hadamard product is not geometrically meaningful! As of `d0975` there is no longer a `*` defined for vectors. `hadamard(v1, v2)` does what that operator used to do and a version of that for matrices already existed.
The definition of a Rotor is identical to a geometric product (scalar+bivector) so returning one as something like `geometric(v1, v2)` is not inherently wrong but it does seem like it could be misleading because it would mean the Rotor becomes the general object used to store any geometric products.
