> Has Nim all the metaprogramming features that Common Lisp has? No as there are no reader macros in Nim but the better (IMO anyway) alternative is to have a compile-time parser that operators on string literals.
> Has Nim an extensible syntax? I searched a lot about this and I couldn't find > anything about this. No but the hard-coded syntax is so flexible that it doesn't matter. > And about Metaclasses, can it be implemented in Nim using its metaprogramming > facilities? Depends on what you want to accomplish.
