I don't know how much documentation and library support it would ever take for Nim to be worth the hassle to some people. Not to be defeatist but outside factors are always going to be a huge contributor to how little languages are used despite how much people like them.
That's why it's not good to be vague. If we are clear then we have a good outline for what to do with the documentation when the time comes. However as was pointed out in the other thread documentation isn't nearly the #1 priority of what people want fixed in Nim I don't understand the extremely serious atmosphere of this community sometimes. The fact that _style insensitivity_ is the single biggest debate, the most defining aspect of this community should give you the hint to take a couple steps back. I'm saying this as someone who has a fair amount of personal stake in Nim (not financial though), it is not the alpha and the omega of programming languages
