> Why did you have to change it? The original makes sense as long as the return > type can't alias any part of y
It was done to fix <https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/19013> and a better alias analysis might have achieved the same.
> Why did you have to change it? The original makes sense as long as the return > type can't alias any part of y
It was done to fix <https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/19013> and a better alias analysis might have achieved the same.