I was trying to point out the fact that an anonymous proc without parameter type is currently supported by `=>`, but cannot have `void` return type. Not that I support the new syntax. I think the documentation for `=>` should be added with some warnings that some kind of expressions might not work.
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains ElegantBeef
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains alexeypetrushin
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains Araq
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains ElegantBeef
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains alexeypetrushin
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains demotomohiro
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains alexeypetrushin
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains sls1005
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains sls1005
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains demotomohiro
- Suggestion to improve proc type infer, and some complains sls1005