I'd expect nim to be comparable or faster than the twinbasic version of the 
solution. The results I have for days 1 to three are
    
    
    |Day     |twinBasic| Nim|
    |--------|--------|--------|
    |1       | 19.5 ms| 47 ms  |
    |2       | 7.8 ms | 47 ms  |
    |3       | 265 ms | 29 ms  |
    |4       | 265 s  | 480 ms |
    
    
    Run

I'm as a relative newcomer to nim and not a professional programmer I'm sure 
that looking at others code will be helpful (as it has already been), but I was 
hoping for more along the lines on comments on the specific bits of nim that I 
am using. my nim solutions are effectively direct translations of the twinBasic 
so I was expecting that the efficiency of nim would win over a programming 
language that is in beta and has no optimisations. 

Reply via email to