I'd expect nim to be comparable or faster than the twinbasic version of the
solution. The results I have for days 1 to three are
|Day |twinBasic| Nim|
|--------|--------|--------|
|1 | 19.5 ms| 47 ms |
|2 | 7.8 ms | 47 ms |
|3 | 265 ms | 29 ms |
|4 | 265 s | 480 ms |
Run
I'm as a relative newcomer to nim and not a professional programmer I'm sure
that looking at others code will be helpful (as it has already been), but I was
hoping for more along the lines on comments on the specific bits of nim that I
am using. my nim solutions are effectively direct translations of the twinBasic
so I was expecting that the efficiency of nim would win over a programming
language that is in beta and has no optimisations.