> Hm, I'd have seen this more as a move of status contributing since in my head > they're both (the status-org and the nim-org) very separate entities. However > I guess who belongs to what group and if that's a meaningful distinction is > sufficiently intransparent to me as a someone not working on any of the > core-stuff that I'll happily accept being wrong there.
They are separate entities and the plugin is under nim-lang.org because it is official. But Status does sponsor this work. Thank you!
