On the `atomics` API design: is there a reason there is no converter to `T` instead of the explicit `load` (which would be equivalent to C++'s [std::atomic operator T](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/operator_T))? Or is there a hidden footgun with a converter?
- ARC vs refc Araq
- ARC vs refc mig
- ARC vs refc Araq
- ARC vs refc mig
- ARC vs refc Araq
- ARC vs refc Alogani
- ARC vs refc mratsim
- ARC vs refc mig
- ARC vs refc mig
- ARC vs refc Araq
- ARC vs refc mig
- ARC vs refc Araq
- ARC vs refc mratsim
