I'm trying to link your comments to what specifically in the code you object to.

After thinking about it overnight, here are my guesses. Are they correct?
    
    
    It is usually a bad idea to interfer with the compiler in ways unforseen by 
the compiler devs ;-)
    
    
    Run

Does this refer to the fact that the macro explicitly compiles the 
`destroyFields(...)` statement? By "compiles", I mean parsing the statement in 
the context of the surrounding code, and generating an AST for it - again, in 
the context of the surreounding code.
    
    
    if you want your own memory management you should use ptr.
    
    
    Run

Does this refer to the use of ``=destroy`(x.field.addr[])` to trigger 
destruction of a field, instead of ``=destroy`(x.field)`?

I have an idea how to address the first item. I'll update the code and post 
here when/if I get it working. 

Reply via email to