Krux02: Well, we all know that of course. I was talking about "advertising" on the start page. "Optional, highly tunable GC" sounds great, and is not really wrong. Standard lib depends on GC, that is true. But for embedded devices or microcontrollers we may not need seqs and strings, so we may work in principle without GC. And I think there is even a stack-based GC option in development.
"unparalleled performance" are really strong words -- smart people know D, Rust and C/C++ well and see at once that this statement is not fully true. One more remark: Personally I would put license information on the front page -- fully open source, community supported, MIT licensed. Not only for Libman that is an important fact, I have missed that information on front pages of some other languages. Putting it in the FAQ may be an indication that license is not a high priority for the developers, indicating that License may change later...
