> I have yet to seen a single example of anybody using namespacing in 
> functional programming. Then again, its relative "new" in PHP. rofl

PHP is all but a functional programming language. I think you are confusing 
terms here, _functional_ programming languages are things like Haskell, Scheme 
or (to a lesser extent) LISP. Others provide some functional features in 
addition to imperative programming.

There are lots of programming languages which provide namespaces without being 
necessarily OOP. Nim itself uses namespaces, which map to filenames (like 
Python does). Ada has a package system which is the most feature-rich namespace 
implementation ever, without forcing the user to do OOP. Go uses directories as 
namespaces.

> Yada yada yada ... typical forum bully tactics.

I have just answered to your arguments in a critical, but neutral way. This is 
quite the opposite of _forum bully tactics_, which include, amongst others, [ad 
hominem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem) tactics (like, for example, 
calling another user a _forum bully_).

> Lets all wast hours fighting it out on a forum so one of use can both feel 
> superior.

This is not and was never my intent. Where do you deduce this from? Because I 
criticized your arguments? This is what a discussion is for. If you do not want 
to discuss, there is no point in answering here.

> There is always somebody who gets pissed or disagrees and then wants to wast 
> hours discussing something that will not change both parties there opinion 
> anyway.

I am not pissed. You seem to be. You even state that later in your post.

> Bullshit first class. If you can not tell the different between a piece of 
> OOP & FP code, then you really do not need to start arguing about it. Feeling 
> superior yet?

As I said, you seem to confuse the term _functional programming_ with 
_imperative, procedural, non-OOP programming_. I do not want to continue this 
discussion on a level where you just rely on personal attacks, thanks.

Reply via email to