+1 for nimsuggest's improvement and actually I puzzled people complain about lack of IDE support because there are already many editors or IDEs support for Nim: [https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/wiki/editor-support](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/wiki/editor-support)
Back to nim survey, I wondered the opinion about "prefer functional paradigm" that no nim users answered. should we ask more dedicated questions about fp if we have second survey? since nim already support some functional programming futures. (i.e, ->, =>, lc[] macro of future package, apply procedure, or vegansk's nimfp library, or noSideEffect pragma) or maybe just lack of advertisement? (I'm not so sure about functional programming, so please correct me if I'm wrong)
