Oh great that's works !
template constructFooOtherNestedClass*[T; T1; T2](): FooOtherNestedClass[T,
T1, T2] =
implConstructFooOtherNestedClass(typedesc[T], typedesc[T1], typedesc[T2])
proc implConstructFooOtherNestedClass*(T, T1, T2: typedesc):
FooOtherNestedClass[T, T1, T2] {.
constructor, importcpp: "Foo<\'*1>::OtherNestedClass<\'*2,\'*3>()",
header: "typename.hpp".}
template constructFooOtherNestedClass*[T; T1; T2](i: cint):
FooOtherNestedClass[T, T1, T2] =
implConstructFooOtherNestedClass(typedesc[T], typedesc[T1], typedesc[T2],
i)
proc implConstructFooOtherNestedClass*(T, T1, T2: typedesc, i: cint):
FooOtherNestedClass[T, T1, T2] {.
constructor, importcpp: "###Foo<\'*1>::OtherNestedClass<\'*2,\'*3>(@)",
#The ### is to avoid the three first argumenta being passed to the constructor
header: "typename.hpp".}
but too bad there is a bug preventing me from using it :/ It seems that we
cannot overload templates with generic parameters:
var nc = constructFooOtherNestedClass[float, float64, int8]()
gives me:
Error: type mismatch: got ()
but expected one of:
template constructFooOtherNestedClass[T; T1; T2](i: cint):
FooOtherNestedClass[T, T1,
T2]
test case:
#this works
template test() =
echo "no param"
template test(i: int)=
echo "in param"
test()
test(1)
#but this not
template test[T]() =
echo "no param"
template test[T](i: int)=
echo "in param"
test[int]()
test[int](1)
[https://play.nim-lang.org/?gist=f92e0ddcce67df8ca604a253ead94e21](https://play.nim-lang.org/?gist=f92e0ddcce67df8ca604a253ead94e21)
