Re: ASM on Windows basically dead?

[monster]

@jackmott I'm confused by your question. I thought that calls like 
_InterlockedExchangeAddNoFence64() _were_ intrinsics, therefore, isn't that 
what I'm already trying to do? (But failing for some unclear reason, since the 
failure is at link time, where they should already have been "replaced") Until 
now, I assumed that "compiler intrinsics" are "things that look like functions 
to the caller, but get replaced directly with assembler by the compiler". Is 
that wrong?