> It's time to write thoughtful comments that encourage developers to use Nim
Agreed, but we have some issues. Consider the excellent article in 'How I start: Nim', which begins > Nim is a young and exciting imperative programming language that is nearing > its 1.0 release. Wat? Nim has been nearing it's 1.0 release for a few years now; one of the nice [intros](https://hookrace.net/blog/what-is-special-about-nim/), also by @def, says > But on the bright side, Nim 1.0 is supposed to be released within the next 3 > months! and this is from January 2015. I realize that Nim has been pretty good about breaking changes, but that's still not encouraging. Many developers I know would avoid Nim for that reason alone. Sorry for the thread hijack...
