nlvm is an exciting development for Nim, and I hope one day it is like LDC is for D, but C has great reach. Ideally there would be multiple backends; why remove compilation targets? Even if LLVM target generated faster code (for example) there aren't as many backends as for C.
- Is NLVM the future of Nim? Atlas
- Re: Is NLVM the future of Nim? Krux02
- Re: Is NLVM the future of Nim? bpr