@Udiknedormin
+1 for finding weird edge cases! lol
Ideally I would like to be able to initialize an array in the constructor
syntax directly, like any other type. It is strange that arrays are different.
Even sequence has the special _@[]_ syntax for this.
but it is such a minor thing that I am not bothered by it too much.
I would make a github issue if the people or the core devs think it is worth
it? ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯
I was avoiding _object_ because I wanted to avoid things like extra magic
pointers; if I can just avoid the using _of_ to get the same effect then that's
fine with me!
Good point about the cost of default initialization. In this case that is the
exact behavior that I want, but it is definitely something to keep in mind. I
will remember {.noinit.} for the future.
