> Keep in mind you can also turn getVal and getMutableVal into templates
> instead of procs to get rid of runtime overhead. Templates don't need type
> information, they transform AST into other AST during compile time (from my
> knowledge at least).
Yes templates always inline at the Nim level. But if a proc is enough and you
don't want the function call overhead, just add the {.inline.} pragma and keep
your templates in reserve for things that require them.
I've done an in-depth review of the C code and Assembly produced of [inline
procs vs templates](https://github.com/status-im/mpint/issues/3). C code is
different, assembly is the same.
