Use case:
I'm trying to make a really basic sdl2 library from scratch, that maps directly
to the C version.
The C code declares this function:
Sdl_Quit
But there's also this constant:
SDL_QUIT
Due to Nim's style-insensitivity, I can't have both of these identifiers as is.
eg they both start with a caps S, and otherwise look the same in terms of
identifier name to the Nim compiler
Possible to get some kind of pragma to use strict styling rather than flexible
styling?
eg something like this;
{.push strictStyle.}
proc Sdl_Quit() = ...
const SDL_QUIT = ...
{.pop strictStyle.}
Then those identifiers only ever get used in the code if you use the exact same
naming, rather than eg, nim thinking the two are the same identifier.
Comments?
PS: My current temporary workaround is to name the SDL_QUIT constant,
SDL_QUIT_CONST. But that means that I can't get a direct 1-1 mapping between C
code and nim code (for instance).
Or is there perhaps some existing method, eg stropping, which already handles
this kind of problem?
