> it can use more memory than a "naked" switch
that doesn't make sense to me; it would be a array (ie compile time length), so would only use stack allocation; furthermore I don't see how switch would use less stack memory
> it can use more memory than a "naked" switch
that doesn't make sense to me; it would be a array (ie compile time length), so would only use stack allocation; furthermore I don't see how switch would use less stack memory