I would have been interested in a vote, but apparently I'm the minority ;).
Personally I find the case insensitivity very off-putting and it was one of the reasons why I stayed away from Nim the first times I came across it. > I appreciate when Nim forgives me a typo That's my main concern about it. I like consistency, and I don't want inconsistent naming in my code base. I want the compiler to help me get it right exactly. I never saw it as a feature, rather a quirk that I can live with. Yet, sometimes I still feel like I'm manually doing the work of the compiler when I'm double checking that I use consistent style. And I get distracted when reading foreign Nim code that switches between equivalent names for no apparent reason, especially when done in a local scope, where the syntax becomes obviously inferior to a consistent naming.
