Maybe I was just insanely lucky or maybe in your field there are particularly dangerous spots - but I can't confirm your impression. My experience with Nim is that it's surprisingly well working.
The probably biggest problem I see is **documentation**. It _seems_ to cover most areas but it doesn't really or only superficially. I end up looking at the source and experimenting way more often than I like. > Freezing the language for some time and fixing compiler bugs, refactoring, > maturing I think would be good for Nim. Fully agreed. Nim urgently needs to stop being ever moving and to become stable and reliable (also as in "works as expected"). I also agree with your statement that _keeping_ (happy) users is more important and decisive than winning them over.
