Re: [help needed] nim version of: COMPARING PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES IN C++, D, AND RUST

[cblake]

Also, I guess a TL;DR part C) - I was never arguing against the tautology that 
a faster algorithm is faster. That is kind of a weird straw man position. No 
idea how quoting 600 microseconds for it left that impression, but maybe bears 
correcting the record. (I didn't assess correctness, though perhaps I should 
have. To me that whole algo area is besides the point of the prevailing 
discussion of an artificial benchmark. I never need Pythagorean triples, 
myself.)