> How about some screencasts about how to work with objects. Not to hijack your thread, but I'd like to know what the plan is, if any, with OOP in future Nim (v2 or whatever). **method** and generics don't work well together in Nim, or at least it's been a disaster for me when I've tried to use them together.
I was reading about the Delphi descendant 'Modern Pascal' which is very Nim-like (OK, I like Nim syntax better and it is lacking Nim's metaprogramming) and I noticed that they settled on a Java like model for OOP. I'm not an OOP enthusiast, and in a rich language like Nim it's not as necessary as in a language like Java, but I do think Nim should have decent OOP support that blends well with other features in the language. I don't think Nim is there yet, and I wish that rather than trying to patch up **method** Nim just adopts a fairly boring but well understood system.
