1. Well yes, that's how it works, as in the B/D paper and in the current implementation of `--newruntime`. 2. There is an implicit type conversion from owned to unowned and afterwards the ordinary `=` for unowned is used,
- Re: Owned refs andrea
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs andrea
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs treeform
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs Araq
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
- Re: Owned refs GordonBGood
