> @libman please calm down and be less verbose in these quite offtopic > discussions. Yes, you like MIT and dislike GPL, we know, you don't have to > repeat it again and again...
I didn't repeat it, I brought up a new point about an exodus of Python programmers not happy with the growing SJW culture in that community, and how it could benefit Nim. > Currently you're more harmful then helpful in protomoting Nim, I'm afraid. I'm sorry that you feel that way... But is that a fact? I can point to people becoming interested in Nim because of my advocacy and the specific copyfree / "libertarian" points that I specialize in. Can you point to anyone seriously saying "Nim needs more license restrictions"? Do you enjoy not being able to promote code to Nim's stdlib, which by design logic should be included there, because it came from [a PPL-licensed module](https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4703)?
