> does -d:danger do the same that previously release did? Yes.
> `const x = uint32(-1)` was really useful, shall we rely now on > `cast[uint32](-1)` ? `const x = uint32(not 0)` > What's the reason behind this decision? Explicit is better than implicit. See [this issue](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/10963).
