I guess you're right that it would need a change to the compiler but AFAICT 'proc' fields of an object are in the same situation and we have an iterator (more precisely an unrolled for-loop) for field name/type pairs.
- Statically reflect on procs in scope that dispatch on some type T. deech
- Re: Statically reflect on procs in scope that dispatch on some ... Araq
- Re: Statically reflect on procs in scope that dispatch on s... deech
