While no doubt some will be annoyed, there's also an opportunity for learning
how to code well in Nim. I'm inexperienced in using Nim and it can be difficult
to decide which packages are high-quality (although looking at the assessments
on the spreadsheet the overall quality appears good). There's one package, for
example, that I was planning to use that gets a 2 for code quality. Possibly a
separate document recording reasons for the initial score and
responses/improvements would be useful for newcomers like myself.
