As much as I appreciate the enthusiasm and effort, I'd have much preferred all this time and effort was spent contributing to even one of these packages. Most, if not all are one man shows and a free contribution to the community. Expecting decent scores on any of them is ludicrous. It takes weeks to make something useful but years to mature.
The right way to go about this is to allow the community to vote, the herd can do a better job than one person's opinionated scrub followed by the package author's biased adjustment. It's like asking one person to set the rating on Amazon and then asking the seller to adjust if they disagree. The nimble directory is the place to do this so contribute there and make it more robust and the goto place for packages rather than doing something in a spreadsheet. Last, some free advice: I'll really recommend everyone discuss ideas before spending hours on something. I've seen many times where people open elaborate PR's and feel discouraged when it is shot down. Buy-in is much much more important than working code.
