Consider this code:
var x: 0..15 = 12
var s: set[0..15] = {12}
Run
The first line defining x works fine. The second line defining s fails with
this error:
/usercode/in.nim(1, 21) Error: type mismatch: got <set[range
0..65535(int)]> but expected 'set[range 0..15(int)]'
Run
After some experimentation it seems like a set literal with bare numeric
literals inside is always interpreted as a `set[range 0..65535(int)]` unless
there's some other variable in there to force the typing. ex:
var x: 0..15 = 11
var s: set[0..15] = {x, 12}
Run
works.
Is this a bug/oversight in Nim? Is there a way to specify the type on a set
literal? Is there a way to create a range number constant? (apart from
`range[0..15](12)` which is quite ugly.)
