Re: Why is Seq.reverse() not part of the standard lib?

[Araq]

Multiplying the number of procs by 2 just so that we get `-ed` versions of 
every inplace operation is a bad reason and so we refuse to do that. Instead 
we're getting `outplace`, see 
[https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/12593](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/12593)