And before Python 3.0, there were probably people who did complain about their absence. Rationalizations tend to be disingenuous, and there's a lot of that here. Not that it matters, because Nim's handling--and lack of handling--of underscores is not something that's going to change.
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore juancarlospaco
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore sschwarzer
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore poseidon
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Libman
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Skaruts
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore poseidon
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Skaruts
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore mratsim
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore tedlavarias
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore sschwarzer
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore jibal
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore mashingan
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore sschwarzer
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Araq
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore mratsim
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore e
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore cumulonimbus
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore cblake
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Araq
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore cblake
- Re: Naming conventions - need leading underscore Araq
