This is a serious bug, `-d:danger` should imply `-d:release` to the point that `defined(release)` is true. We will fix it and backport the fix.
- Is "danger" define supposed to also define "... Yardanico
- Re: Is "danger" define supposed to also defi... Yardanico
- Re: Is "danger" define supposed to also ... Yardanico
- Re: Is "danger" define supposed to a... ktamp
- Re: Is "danger" define supposed ... Yardanico
- Re: Is "danger" define supp... juancarlospaco
- Re: Is "danger" define ... Araq
- Re: Is "danger" def... Vindaar
- Re: Is "danger" def... dom96
