The Case for CFLsCompact fluorescent light bulbs are safe, and they look great, 
too.    
  CFL use is spiraling upward

  I'm constantly being told that the simplest way to improve my green cred is 
to start using compact fluorescent lights. Yet some naysayer argue that the 
environmental benefits of CFLs are negated by their mercury content. Who's 
right?
   
  The case against CFLs is built largely on half-truths and innuendo. Yes, the 
energy-saving bulbs contain mercury, a neurotoxin responsible for a tremendous 
amount of human suffering over the years. And safely recycling CFLs remains far 
more difficult than it should be. But these facts don't justify sticking with 
inefficient incandescent technology that has barely changed since the invention 
of the tungsten filament nearly a century ago.
  CFLs are lauded by environmentalists because they require far less electrical 
power than their incandescent counterparts. A 26-watt CFL bulb produces the 
same lumens as a 100-watt incandescent bulb. Assuming that you keep one of 
those bulbs aglow for six hours a day, switching to a CFL will save you 126 
kilowatt-hours of electricity per year, which translates to 170 pounds of 
carbon dioxide emissions on average. Now, how many bulbs do you have in your 
house? Twenty? Thirty? Replace them all and you could conceivably (assuming 
six-hour-a-day use throughout the building) reduce your annual CO2 output by 
upward of 2.3 metric tons—about 10 percent of the average American household's 
annual carbon footprint.
    
---------------------------------
      placeAd2(commercialNode,'midarticleflex',false,'')      
  
---------------------------------
  
  Just look at what's forecast for Australia, which last year became the first 
nation to mandate a gradual phase-out of incandescent bulbs. According to 
Australia's Environment Minister, the measure will eventually slash the 
country's greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million metric tons per year—the 
equivalent of taking 1 million vehicles off the road.
  But what about the mercury? The toxic heavy metal is integral to the design 
of current CFL bulbs: Electricity agitates the mercury molecules, causing them 
to emit ultraviolet light. That light then spurs a bulb's phosphor coating to 
give off visible light. But the amount contained in each bulb is barely enough 
to cover the tip of a ballpoint pen, and won't cause any bodily harm as long as 
simple precautions are taken. The National Electrical Manufacturers Association 
has voluntarily imposed a limit of 5 milligrams per bulb on all CFLs sold in 
the United States—about 1 percent of the mercury contained in an old home 
thermometer. Since manufacturers are well aware that health fears are 
preventing the widespread adoption of CFLs, most have committed to making bulbs 
with even less mercury than NEMA's standard. The average CFL bulb now contains 
around 4 milligrams of mercury, and that figure should drop closer to 2 
milligrams in the very near future. Much of the credit for
 these reductions goes to Wal-Mart, which has pressured GE, Royal Phillips, and 
Osram Sylvania to cut down on the quicksilver.
  The irony of CFLs is that they actually reduce overall mercury emissions in 
the long run. Despite recent improvements in the industry's technology, the 
burning of coal to produce electricity emits roughly 0.023 milligrams of 
mercury per kilowatt-hour. Over a year, then, using a 26-watt CFL in the 
average American home (where half of the electricity comes from coal) will 
result in the emission of 0.66 milligrams of mercury. For 100-watt incandescent 
bulbs, which produce the identical amount of light, the figure is 2.52 
milligrams.
  Ah, but what if your CFL bulb shatters? First off, don't panic: Unless you 
plan on picking up the glass with bare hands and then licking it, you're almost 
certainly safe from harm. Just follow the EPA's easy cleanup guidelines, which 
include placing the remnants in a sealed plastic bag and washing your hands 
when the chore is finished, and all should be well. (Also, use common sense and 
don't place CFLs where they can be damaged by young children.) As for that 
oft-told horror story about the woman in Maine who was quoted a price of $2,000 
to dispose of a busted CFL bulb, don't believe it—at least not entirely. She 
may have been the mark for a shady contractor; get the facts here (PDF) and 
here.
  Even a broken CFL bulb won't leak too much toxic metal. According to the EPA, 
just 6.8 percent of the mercury in a CFL bulb—that's at most 0.34 milligrams—is 
released if it shatters. OSHA's permissible exposure limit for mercury vapor in 
the workplace is 0.1 milligrams per cubic meter, so you'd have to break that 
bulb in an extremely cramped space for there to be an appreciable hazard.
  Critics of CFLs have stressed that the mercury savings may be negligible in 
areas such as the Pacific Northwest, where hydropower is prevalent. (A Seattle 
newspaper columnist makes the case here.) But keep in mind that all power grids 
are at least partly dependent on coal; according to the EPA's Power Profiler, 
for example, Washington's Puget Sound Energy still derives 34 percent of its 
fuel from coal. As a result, CFLs still have a significant edge in terms of 
mercury emissions, to say nothing of greenhouse gas emissions.
  There is one major knock on CFLs, though, and that's the current dearth of 
recycling options. Because of the mercury issues, it's unwise—and often 
illegal—to throw spent CFL bulbs in the trash. (A single broken bulb is one 
thing, but thousands upon thousands of broken bulbs in a garbage dump could be 
seriously bad news.) You can find local recycling centers here, take your bulbs 
to the nearest IKEA, or use a mail-in service such as RecyclePak. All of these 
options, alas, require a bit more motivation than tossing your beer cans in a 
blue bin. But look for several major retailers to set up recycling drop-off 
boxes this year, in order to goose their CFL sales.
  The last, desperate swipe at CFLs—as elucidated by the Lantern's colleague 
last week—is that their light is cold and dreadful. Perhaps this was true in 
years past, but the Lantern just doesn't see it anymore: In a recent test, 
Popular Mechanics rated CFL light as far superior to that produced by 
incandescent bulbs. Don't believe the hype? You've got nothing to lose by 
trying a single CFL bulb (one that's received EnergyStar certification) and 
seeing for yourself. And then, once you've become a convert, please spread the 
word.



 
    
  check out my website......http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/arubyrogers/
   

       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

Reply via email to