Ludovic Courtès wrote:
before describing what this was about ;-)), and sounded like an
after-the-fact justification (the code was already in).
(I'm not offering much technical help for the moment, just giving my
impressions on the way you "introduced" us to this.)
Well, if not for missed files, it would be a conservative extension
(everyone is free to ignore it).
So in current state (few developers, few packages) it is OK for
non-breaking changes
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
