Michael Raskin writes: > Except that in insane Makefile replacing -Wall that is only used as a > parameter to gcc meaning warning level with -Wno-all will change > resulting binary.
I beg your pardon? > | Nix doesn't know that. > > And no program can know such things absolutely reliably.. There is no need to be defensive. Instead of being in denial about a missing use-case, it's much more productive to find ways to improve the software. For example, it could be possible for a Nix expression to declare certain parameters as "pure", meaning that they don't need to be incorporated into the hash. An expression "foo" that supports make's -j flag, for example, might want to receive an argument "cpu_count". Still, instance of (foo 4) and (foo 8) are the same thing. It's not like something like that couldn't be supported in Nix. The only thing that might stand in the way are egos, because you can't fix problems that you can't admit to exist. > | Which makes me wonder: is it possible to get SVN access? It feels > | like posting code and/or patches to the mailing list is not the > | best way to participate. > > Write to Eelco Dolstra.. I did, and I was asking him this very question again because I received no response. Please don't get me wrong, I don't mean to appear impatient. Best regards, Peter _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
