Hi,
Nicolas Pierron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 16:43, Eelco Dolstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolas Pierron wrote:
This saves a lot of typing (not to mention not having to update
all-packages.nix with purely mechanical changes). It saves as much
typing as the "args: with args;" style, but has the advantage that
the function arguments are properly declared (not implicit in what
the body of the "with" uses).
This was not implicit before ?
Sorry, I don't understand the question :-)
I mean does this following code suppose to pass before ?
({a}: true) {a=1; b=2;}
with no ellipses.
No, this didn't/doesn't work.
> Is there a special reason to refuse sets with extra
attributes ?
Well, you get a bit more error checking: if you pass a useless attribute, you
get an error. Whether that's very helpful in practice is another matter...
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
