Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I just noticed that the build farm failed because of TinyCC on FreeBSD:
>
> checking pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix on i686-freebsd
> error: while instantiating the derivation named `tinycc-0.9.24' at
> `/tmp/nix-build-dxjks8lw9swmy3km3zgsxiby32dziq5y-source-tarball.drv-0/vfvpbk5wqkimwb39z0mf0yxx2k611p9p-svn-export/pkgs/development/compilers/tinycc/default.nix',
> line 5:
> while evaluating the derivation attribute `patchPhase' at
> `/tmp/nix-build-dxjks8lw9swmy3km3zgsxiby32dziq5y-source-tarball.drv-0/vfvpbk5wqkimwb39z0mf0yxx2k611p9p-svn-export/pkgs/development/compilers/tinycc/default.nix',
> line 14:
> in a string concatenation:
> attribute `glibc' missing
>
> I suppose this is a non-NixOS platform, i.e., Nix on top of a "regular"
> FreeBSD. Does `stdenv.libc' point to the right libc in such an
> environment? Assuming it does, does `${libc}/libexec/ld-elf.so' exist?
No, stdenv.libc is undefined on FreeBSD because we don't build our own C
library. (Actually, it would be great if we had a pure stdenv on FreeBSD, but
we would have to figure out how to build FreeBSD's C library outside of "make
world". Extra credit for doing the same on Mac OS X ;-) Probably the code in
patchPhase that fixes the location of libc isn't needed on FreeBSD.
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
