Hey, Armijn Hemel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it were up to me, I'd rather go for simpler expressions, instead of > more abstractions I don't understand. These abstractions make it just > too much of an effort to keep up with. +1. Eelco Dolstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also have a hard time understanding a lot of this stuff. This may have > something to do with the coding style, in particular the names of some > identifiers: for instance, a name like "composedArgsAndFun" doesn't tell me a > lot about what that function is supposed to do, yet I see it everywhere. And > this new name "applyAndFun" isn't even grammatical. I couldn't agree more. Thanks, Ludo'. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
