> Another concern is that it catches all exceptions. Compare this with > what other languages typically provide, where only exceptions of the > specified type are caught (it's also usually possible to catch > exceptions of any type, e.g., by specifying `Exception' as the exception > type in Java, but that has to be made explicit.)
We don't have types.. Are you thinking about catchString catchAttrs catchNull catchList ? I guess we can do this all using rethrow or so. Marc _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
